Iran & Turkey: Navigating Rivalry And Shared Regional Interests

Kenyon Legros 18 Jun 2025

The relationship between Iran and Turkey is a fascinating and intricate tapestry woven from threads of historical rivalry, geopolitical competition, and surprising pockets of shared interest. For decades, these two regional powerhouses have engaged in a delicate balancing act, often finding themselves on opposing sides of critical conflicts, yet simultaneously recognizing the imperative of cooperation in certain spheres. Understanding this complex dynamic is crucial for anyone seeking to grasp the broader shifts and tensions within the Middle East and beyond.

From the battlegrounds of Syria to the strategic energy corridors and the nuances of diplomatic exchanges, the ties that bind and separate Iran and Turkey are constantly evolving. This article delves into the multifaceted nature of their relationship, exploring the historical roots of their competition, the contemporary flashpoints that define their rivalry, and the underlying economic and strategic drivers that sometimes pull them together, even amidst profound disagreements.

Table of Contents

A Tapestry of Rivalry and Interdependence
Syria: The Crucible of Regional Ambition
Proxy Battlegrounds Beyond Syria
Economic Lifelines: Trade Amidst Sanctions
Navigating the Israel-Iran Nexus
Internal Dynamics and Intelligence Shifts
People-to-People Connections: Beyond Geopolitics
The Road Ahead: A Future of Calculated Engagement

A Tapestry of Rivalry and Interdependence

The relationship between Iran and Turkey is undeniably complex, marked by competition over influence in regions like Syria and the Caucasus. This rivalry often manifests through proxy conflicts, where both states support opposing factions to advance their respective agendas. Despite this inherent competition, it's crucial to acknowledge that both countries also share certain interests, creating a nuanced dynamic that defies simple categorization. For decades, Turkey and Iran have been regional rivals, with Syria frequently serving as a primary battleground for their competing ambitions.

After a prolonged period of carefully managed tensions, where both nations sought to maintain a delicate balance, recent shifts in the regional balance of power have increasingly put Turkey and Iran at odds. There is little doubt that Turkey, despite being a fellow Islamist power – albeit one rooted in a different ethnicity and sect of Islam – is a geostrategic rival of Iran’s. This underlying competition for regional hegemony shapes many of their interactions, from diplomatic spats to proxy confrontations.

Syria: The Crucible of Regional Ambition

The Syrian civil war has served as the most prominent and contentious issue in the often-complicated ties between Turkey and Iran. For Tehran, the Assad regime has long been considered a critical strategic ally in the Middle East, representing a vital link in its regional "Axis of Resistance." Iran has invested heavily, both militarily and economically, to prop up Assad's government, viewing its survival as essential to projecting power and maintaining influence across the Levant.

However, as Turkey has increasingly asserted its own influence in Syria, particularly in the northern and northwestern parts of the country, Iran's ability to project power in the region has been steadily diminishing. This shift has created a significant vacuum, which Turkey has actively sought to fill, much to the Islamic Republic’s discontent. The differing objectives and approaches in Syria have been a constant source of friction, leading to direct diplomatic tensions.

Recent events underscore this growing friction. For instance, diplomatic tensions between Turkey and Iran flared following critical remarks by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan. Fidan issued a warning to Tehran against undermining Syria's stability, a statement that sparked a media uproar and led to both Turkey and Iran’s foreign ministries summoning their respective envoys. This incident reflects a broader shift in the Middle East, where Turkey is increasingly challenging Iran's established positions, particularly in areas Iran considers vital to its strategic depth.

Proxy Battlegrounds Beyond Syria

While Syria remains a central point of contention, the rivalry between Iran and Turkey extends far beyond its borders, playing out in various proxy battlegrounds across the wider region. These conflicts highlight the divergent strategic interests and alliances that define the complex relationship between these two regional heavyweights.

The Caucasus: A Delicate Balance

One significant arena for their indirect competition is the Caucasus, particularly concerning the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. In this long-standing dispute, Iran has historically backed Armenia, maintaining close ties and providing support. Conversely, Turkey has thrown its full weight behind Azerbaijan, a Turkic and predominantly Shia Muslim nation, providing military assistance and diplomatic backing. This divergence underscores their differing geopolitical alignments and historical ties in the region, with Turkey seeking to expand its influence in the Turkic world, while Iran aims to maintain its traditional sphere of influence and secure its northern borders.

Palestine: Divergent Paths

Further south, in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Iran and Turkey again find themselves on opposing sides. Iran has long been a staunch supporter of Hamas, providing financial and military aid, and positioning itself as a leading voice against Israeli occupation. Its policy is rooted in an ideological commitment to resistance and a desire to rally support across the Muslim world. Meanwhile, Turkey, while historically supportive of the Palestinian cause, has recently pursued normalization with Israel. This strategic shift reflects Ankara's pragmatic foreign policy, balancing its ideological stance with economic and security interests, and seeking to re-engage with a broader range of regional actors. This divergence in approach towards one of the Middle East's most enduring conflicts highlights the fundamental differences in their strategic priorities and alliances.

Gulf Relations: A Wider Context

The broader regional context further complicates the Iran-Turkey dynamic. Iran remains at odds with nearly all its neighboring states in the Gulf, a situation that often isolates Tehran and limits its regional maneuvering. This isolation, partly due to its revolutionary foreign policy and nuclear program, contrasts with Turkey's more flexible and often pragmatic approach to regional diplomacy. While Turkey also faces its own set of challenges with Gulf states, its capacity for engagement and normalization, as seen with Israel, often provides it with greater strategic flexibility compared to Iran. This wider regional posture influences how both nations perceive and interact with each other, with Turkey sometimes leveraging its broader relationships to gain an advantage in its rivalry with Iran.

Economic Lifelines: Trade Amidst Sanctions

Despite the profound political and strategic differences, economic ties form a crucial, often overlooked, dimension of the Iran-Turkey relationship. Turkey has consistently emphasized its commitment to maintaining strong trade relations with Iran, even in the face of stringent international sanctions against Tehran. This steadfastness has made Turkey one of Iran’s most important trading partners, a lifeline for an economy frequently under immense pressure.

The economic interdependence is significant. The value of trade exchanges between Iran and Turkey is expected to reach an ambitious target of $16 billion by March 2025, a testament to the robust commercial links that persist despite geopolitical headwinds. This trade relationship is particularly vital for Turkey, which relies heavily on energy imports, including from Iran. This reliance means that rising oil prices, often exacerbated by regional conflicts or international tensions involving Iran, could aggravate inflation and further strain Turkey's already troubled economy. The economic pragmatism, therefore, often tempers the political rivalry, as both nations recognize the mutual benefits derived from their trade relationship, particularly in energy and other key sectors.

Navigating the Israel-Iran Nexus

The volatile relationship between Israel and Iran adds another complex layer to Turkey's foreign policy considerations, often placing Ankara in a delicate balancing act. When Israel launched strikes targeting Iran’s nuclear program and military officials, observers in Turkey noted an increase in arrivals from Iran, although Turkish officials were quick to dismiss social media reports of a large-scale influx, emphasizing that any movements were within normal parameters.

Turkey’s official stance on the Israeli-Iranian confrontation has been notably critical of Israel’s actions. Ankara has publicly stated that Iran possesses the legitimate right to defend itself against Israel’s attacks, particularly given that these strikes occurred while nuclear negotiations were reportedly ongoing. This position, while seemingly supportive of Iran, also reflects Turkey's broader foreign policy principles regarding national sovereignty and self-defense, and its consistent criticism of what it perceives as Israeli aggression in the region.

Interestingly, the United States played a role in this dynamic. Sources familiar with the matter told Middle East Eye that the United States notified Turkey of Israel's plans to strike Iran on Friday, a few hours before the strikes took place. This notification suggests a degree of trust and communication between Washington and Ankara, allowing Turkey to prepare for potential repercussions and perhaps even to calibrate its public response. This intricate interplay of alliances and communications highlights the multifaceted nature of regional security, where Turkey attempts to maintain its strategic autonomy while navigating the complex web of international relations.

Internal Dynamics and Intelligence Shifts

The complexities in the relationship between Iran and Turkey are not solely external, driven by regional conflicts and power struggles. Internal dynamics within each country, particularly within their intelligence and security apparatuses, also play a significant role in shaping their interactions. Over the last decade, for instance, Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization (MIT) underwent a significant internal overhaul related to its Iran operations.

An internal investigation determined that, since 2013, most members of the MIT’s Iran desk had been purged. This drastic measure suggests a deep-seated concern within Turkish intelligence about potential vulnerabilities or compromised operations related to Iran. Such a purge could stem from various factors, including suspected espionage, ideological shifts within the intelligence agency, or a strategic re-evaluation of how Turkey handles its intelligence gathering and counter-intelligence efforts concerning its eastern neighbor. This internal restructuring within a key state institution reflects the profound and often complicated nature of the ties between the two nations, underscoring that even at the level of covert operations, the relationship is fraught with challenges and suspicions, alongside the more overt geopolitical rivalries.

People-to-People Connections: Beyond Geopolitics

While the geopolitical landscape between Iran and Turkey is dominated by rivalry and strategic competition, it is important to remember that human connections and cultural exchanges also form a significant, albeit less publicized, aspect of their relationship. These ties often transcend the political rhetoric and provide a softer dimension to the bilateral relations.

For many Iranians, Turkey serves as a crucial gateway to the outside world. Notably, Turkey is one of the few countries Iranians can travel to without a visa, making it a popular destination for tourism, trade, and even as a transit point for those seeking opportunities further afield. This ease of travel facilitates significant people-to-people interactions, fostering cultural exchange and economic activity at a grassroots level that often goes unnoticed amidst high-level diplomatic spats.

However, even within these human connections, complexities exist. For example, the two Kurdish communities, one in Turkey and the other in Iran, generally have little direct contact despite their shared ethnicity. This is partly due to geopolitical divisions and the internal policies of both states concerning their respective Kurdish populations. While the exact population figures for these communities vary, estimates suggest that the Kurdish population in Turkey is significant, with some sources indicating around 14 million, while Iran's Kurdish population is estimated at almost 5 million, making it the third largest ethnic group in the country. The limited interaction between these two large Kurdish communities, despite geographical proximity, highlights how state policies and broader geopolitical tensions can segment even ethnically related populations, underscoring the enduring influence of national borders and political rivalries on human interaction.

The Road Ahead: A Future of Calculated Engagement

The relationship between Iran and Turkey is a testament to the intricate and often paradoxical nature of international relations in the Middle East. It is a dynamic characterized by a profound geostrategic rivalry, played out through proxy conflicts in Syria, the Caucasus, and even in their differing approaches to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Yet, beneath this layer of competition lies a robust economic interdependence, particularly in trade and energy, which acts as a powerful incentive for cooperation and stability.

Recent diplomatic tensions, coupled with internal intelligence shifts and Turkey's evolving stance on regional security, underscore that the relationship is in a constant state of flux. As Turkey increasingly asserts its regional influence, it inevitably comes into greater contact, and sometimes conflict, with Iran’s established positions. However, the shared interests, the mutual economic benefits, and the understanding that outright confrontation would be detrimental to both, ensure that a complete rupture is unlikely.

Moving forward, the relationship between Iran and Turkey will likely continue to be one of calculated engagement. Both nations will navigate their differences with a pragmatic eye, seeking to maximize their respective gains while managing the inherent risks of their rivalry. For observers of Middle Eastern politics, understanding this delicate balance – the constant interplay of competition and cooperation – is key to deciphering the region's future trajectory.

What are your thoughts on the future of Iran and Turkey's relationship? Do you see their shared interests outweighing their rivalries, or vice versa? Share your insights in the comments below, and don't forget to explore our other articles on regional geopolitics for more in-depth analysis!

Iran says no to nuclear talks during conflict as UN urges restraint

HeadlineSphere