Temporary Marriage In Iran: Unveiling Sigheh's Complexities

Hannah Stiedemann 19 Jun 2025

The concept of temporary marriage in Iran, widely known as Sigheh or Nikah Mut'ah, stands as a deeply complex and often controversial practice within the Islamic Republic. Far from a simple marital arrangement, it embodies a multifaceted intersection of religious doctrine, legal frameworks, societal norms, and profound implications for individual rights, particularly those of women. For more than three decades, temporary marriage has been a controversial topic in the Islamic Republic of Iran, sparking debates among scholars, policymakers, and the general public alike.

This article aims to unravel the intricacies of Sigheh, exploring its historical roots, legal justifications, and the significant impact it has on the lives of those involved. By delving into academic perspectives and real-world consequences, we seek to provide a comprehensive understanding of this unique form of marital contract, shedding light on its perceived benefits and the serious concerns it raises regarding women's rights and dignity in Iran.

The Essence of Temporary Marriage in Iran: Sigheh Explained
- Defining Sigheh: A Contractual Nuance
- Historical Context and Religious Interpretations
The Legal Framework of Sigheh in Iran
Sigheh's Controversial Role in Iranian Society
- Impact on Women's Rights and Dignity
- The Analogy of Rent vs. Sale
The Dual Nature of Sigheh: Protection or Exploitation?
Temporary Marriage and Public Health Concerns
Sigheh and the Rise of Sex Tourism
Feminist Perspectives on Temporary Marriage
Navigating the Future of Sigheh in Iran

The Essence of Temporary Marriage in Iran: Sigheh Explained

At its core, temporary marriage in Iran, or Sigheh, is a distinctive form of marital union recognized primarily within Twelver Shia Islam. Unlike permanent marriage, its defining characteristic is a predetermined duration and a specified dowry (mahr), agreed upon in advance by both parties. This unique contractual arrangement sets it apart from conventional understanding of marriage in many parts of the world, making it a subject of continuous fascination and intense debate.

Defining Sigheh: A Contractual Nuance

Nikah mut'ah [1] [2] (Arabic: نكاح المتعة, romanized: nikāḥ al-mutʿah, "pleasure marriage") or temporary marriage [3]: 1045 or Sigheh [4] (Persian: صیغه ، ازدواج موقت) is a private and verbal temporary marriage contract that is practiced in Twelver Shia Islam [5] in which the duration of the marriage and the mahr must be specified and agreed upon in advance. This definition highlights the fundamental elements: a private, verbal contract, a specified duration, and a pre-agreed mahr. This arrangement requires no witnesses, and no registration is needed, which further contributes to its often clandestine nature and the complexities surrounding its regulation and oversight.

Iran’s Sigheh law, also known as “nikah mut’ah” in Arabic, permits men to wed women for a set period of time, engage in sexual activity with them, and then divorce them without facing repercussions. This legal allowance is a significant point of contention, as critics argue it can be exploited, turning a religious allowance into a loophole for various societal issues. Temporary marriages, referred to as mut'a or Sigheh, between Muslim men and women are contractual arrangements that legally unite them for a designated period. This legal recognition by the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which recognizes the validity of two forms of marriage (permanent and temporary), underpins its continued existence and practice.

Historical Context and Religious Interpretations

The practice of temporary marriage, although not a part of Quranic teachings, is still practiced among the Shiites of Iran and Iraq. Its origins are traced back to early Islamic history, where it was purportedly used in specific circumstances, such as during long journeys or military campaigns, to prevent illicit sexual relations. However, its continued practice and justification in modern times are subjects of ongoing theological and legal discourse.

Shi‘a law recognizes two types of marriage contract: Permanent (da’em) and temporary (movaqqat). This distinction is crucial for understanding the legal landscape of marriage in Iran. While permanent marriage is a lifelong commitment, temporary marriage offers a contractual alternative with a defined end. This duality allows for a wide range of interpretations and applications, from legitimate short-term unions to arrangements that blur the lines with transactional relationships.

The Legal Framework of Sigheh in Iran

The legal framework governing temporary marriage in Iran is rooted in Shia Islamic jurisprudence, which grants it legitimacy. Unlike permanent marriage, where the focus is on a lifelong union and shared responsibilities, the legal structure of temporary marriage is often discussed by Shi‘a jurists using the analogy of rent, as opposed to the analogy of sale that is used for permanent marriage. Through this contract, a man acquires sexual access to a woman for a specified period.

This analogy is highly significant because it frames the relationship in terms of temporary usage rather than a holistic partnership. It implies a transactional nature where the man pays a fee (mahr) for a defined period of access. This contrasts sharply with the concept of permanent marriage, which is likened to a "sale" of ownership, implying a more enduring and comprehensive bond. The absence of requirements for witnesses or official registration for Sigheh further streamlines the process, making it easily accessible but also less transparent and harder to regulate. This legal permissibility, coupled with minimal formal requirements, creates a unique legal space for temporary unions that can range from genuine, albeit short-term, commitments to arrangements that raise ethical and social questions.

Sigheh's Controversial Role in Iranian Society

The practice of temporary marriage in Iran has been a source of intense controversy and debate within Iranian society for decades. While proponents argue it offers a legitimate means to satisfy sexual needs, prevent illicit relationships, and provide a safety net for women, critics contend that its implementation often leads to exploitation and undermines women's fundamental rights and dignity. The duality of its perceived benefits and profound drawbacks forms the core of its contentious status.

Impact on Women's Rights and Dignity

One of the most significant criticisms leveled against Sigheh is its potential to harm women's rights and dignity in Iran. Sigheh, or nikah mut‘ah, is a practice that allows men to marry women for a fee and have sex without consequences, a statement that encapsulates the fears of many women's rights advocates. The contractual nature, where a man acquires "ownership, tamlik, of the use of [the] vagina" (Haeri, 1990), implies a transactional relationship where a woman's body is commodified. That is to say, marriage clearly involves the sale of a woman's vagina to a man, a stark and disturbing interpretation that highlights the power imbalance inherent in many Sigheh arrangements.

This perspective raises serious concerns about the autonomy and agency of women. While theoretically, women enter these contracts voluntarily, societal pressures, economic vulnerabilities, and lack of awareness can compel them into arrangements that offer little protection or long-term security. The lack of registration for many Sigheh contracts further exacerbates this vulnerability, making it difficult for women to prove their marital status, claim rights, or seek redress in cases of abandonment or abuse. This review looked at how temporary marriage affects women’s sexual and reproductive health, revealing potential negative impacts due to the transient nature of these unions and the lack of comprehensive health protections often afforded in permanent marriages.

The Analogy of Rent vs. Sale

The legal analogy of "rent" for temporary marriage versus "sale" for permanent marriage is not merely an academic distinction; it has profound implications for the status of women within these unions. In discussing the legal structure of temporary marriage, Shi‘a jurists employ the analogy of rent, as opposed to the analogy of sale that is used for permanent marriage. This framework inherently places the woman in a position akin to property being leased for a period, rather than a partner in an enduring bond. Through this contract, a man acquires sexual access to a woman for a defined duration, reinforcing the idea of a temporary transaction rather than a partnership built on mutual rights and responsibilities beyond the specified period.

This analogy contributes to the perception that Sigheh can be used as a means for males to get around religious rules of not having sex outside of marriage, effectively legitimizing casual sexual encounters under a religious guise. This transactional view of marriage can strip women of their intrinsic value and reduce them to objects of temporary gratification, undermining their social standing and personal dignity. The ease of entering and exiting such contracts without significant repercussions for the man often leaves the woman in a precarious position, particularly if she becomes pregnant or faces social stigma.

The Dual Nature of Sigheh: Protection or Exploitation?

The debate surrounding temporary marriage in Iran is often framed by its dual nature: is it a legitimate religious provision offering protection and a means to fulfill needs, or is it a tool for exploitation? Proponents argue that Sigheh provides a religiously sanctioned outlet for sexual desires, preventing illicit relationships and offering a form of companionship for individuals who may not be ready for permanent marriage, such as students or travelers. For widows or divorced women, it can offer financial support and social legitimacy without the permanence of a full marriage, potentially reducing social stigma.

However, the potential for exploitation is undeniable. Sigheh, as a practice that allows men to marry women for a fee and have sex without consequences, highlights this darker side. The lack of formal registration, especially for shorter contracts, means that women often lack legal recourse if abandoned or mistreated. The power imbalance, often exacerbated by economic disparities, can lead to situations where women are coerced or manipulated into temporary unions that offer them little protection or long-term benefit. Unknown in the West, this type of marriage is a contractual transaction between a man and a woman to be married for a negotiated period of time, usually between one hour and 99 years. This wide range of durations, from extremely short to almost lifelong, underscores the diverse ways Sigheh can be utilized, from a momentary liaison to a long-term, yet impermanent, partnership.

Temporary Marriage and Public Health Concerns

Beyond the social and legal implications, temporary marriage in Iran also raises significant public health concerns, particularly regarding women’s sexual and reproductive health. The transient nature of many Sigheh contracts, combined with the lack of official registration, can create an environment where health risks are heightened and difficult to monitor. This review specifically looked at how temporary marriage affects women’s sexual and reproductive health, highlighting areas of vulnerability.

One primary concern is the potential for increased transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). If men engage in multiple temporary marriages without proper health checks or awareness, the risk of spreading STIs rises. Women in these arrangements may also face challenges in accessing reproductive health services, including contraception and safe abortion, especially if their temporary partners are not supportive or if the union is not officially recognized. Furthermore, the emotional and psychological toll of entering and exiting multiple temporary unions can be substantial, affecting mental health and overall well-being. The lack of social support and the potential for stigma can isolate women, making it harder for them to seek necessary medical or psychological assistance.

Sigheh and the Rise of Sex Tourism

A particularly troubling aspect associated with the practice of temporary marriage in Iran is its alleged link to the rise of sex tourism and even sex trafficking. Iran is seeing an increase in both sex tourism and sex trafficking, and the practice of Sigheh is cited as one factor in this. While Sigheh is intended as a legitimate religious marriage, its flexible and often unregistered nature can be exploited by individuals seeking to engage in commercial sex under a veneer of religious legality.

Foreign men, particularly from neighboring countries, may travel to Iran with the intention of entering into short-term Sigheh contracts, effectively using them as a loophole to engage in sexual activity without the social or legal repercussions associated with prostitution. This phenomenon blurs the lines between legitimate temporary marriage and transactional sex, raising serious ethical questions and contributing to the exploitation of vulnerable women. The ease with which these contracts can be formed and dissolved, coupled with the lack of stringent oversight, makes it challenging to distinguish between genuine temporary unions and those that are essentially commercial transactions, thereby fueling concerns about human trafficking under the guise of religious marriage.

Feminist Perspectives on Temporary Marriage

Feminist scholars have extensively analyzed temporary marriage in Iran, positioning it within the broader framework of female "body politics" and examining how it impacts women's sexuality, autonomy, and social status. Shahla Haeri's "Temporary Marriage in Shi’i Iran" is a valuable academic contribution about Iran’s ethnography in general, and temporary marriage in particular, offering a foundational feminist analysis of the practice. Her work, alongside others, critically examines how Sigheh, despite its religious justification, can serve to control female sexuality and reinforce patriarchal structures.

More recently, Dr. Claudia Yaghoobi, in her book "Temporary Marriage in Iran: Gender and Body Politics in Modern Iranian Film and Literature," has further examined temporary marriage in Iran, also known as Sigheh marriage. Yaghoobi's work, like that of scholars such as Susan Bordo, Sandra Bartky, Janet Wolff, and Monique Wittig, positions itself within the female “body politics,” a feminist theoretical framework on female sexuality. These scholars argue that Sigheh, by allowing men to acquire "ownership" or "use" of a woman's body for a fee, fundamentally reduces women to objects of male desire and convenience. The study proposes a methodology that brings feminist perspectives to analyze the implications of such practices on women's agency and their struggle for equality. This perspective highlights the inherent power imbalances and the ways in which religious and legal frameworks can be interpreted and applied to perpetuate gender inequality, even when cloaked in legitimacy.

Navigating the Future of Sigheh in Iran

The future of temporary marriage in Iran remains a subject of ongoing debate and potential reform. While deeply embedded in Shia jurisprudence and Iranian legal code, its controversial nature, particularly concerning women's rights and public health, continues to draw scrutiny both domestically and internationally. The government of the Islamic Republic of Iran recognizes the validity of two forms of marriage, permanent and temporary, indicating that Sigheh is unlikely to be abolished entirely in the foreseeable future.

However, there is a growing call for greater regulation, oversight, and protection for women involved in these unions. This could include mandatory registration for all temporary marriages, clear guidelines on the rights and responsibilities of both parties, and robust legal mechanisms for women to seek redress in cases of abuse or abandonment. Education and awareness campaigns could also play a crucial role in informing both men and women about the implications of Sigheh, empowering women to make informed choices and understand their rights. Ultimately, navigating the future of temporary marriage in Iran will require a delicate balance between respecting religious traditions and upholding universal principles of human rights and gender equality, ensuring that this unique practice does not inadvertently become a vehicle for exploitation but rather a choice exercised with full autonomy and dignity.

Conclusion

Temporary marriage in Iran, or Sigheh, is a multifaceted practice that embodies a complex interplay of religious tradition, legal interpretation, and profound societal impact. While it is presented as a legitimate form of marriage within Twelver Shia Islam, its implementation often raises serious concerns about women's rights, dignity, and public health. The contractual nature, the analogy of "rent," and the lack of stringent oversight contribute to a system that, while offering some perceived benefits, also carries a significant risk of exploitation, particularly for vulnerable women.

Understanding Sigheh requires acknowledging its dual nature—as a religious allowance and a potential conduit for social ills like sex tourism. As discussions continue about its role in modern Iranian society, it is crucial to prioritize the protection and empowerment of women, ensuring that any form of marital contract upholds their fundamental rights and dignity. We invite you to share your thoughts and perspectives on this complex issue in the comments below, or explore other articles on our site that delve into gender and societal issues in the Middle East.

Vocabulary and Definitions - ppt download

Shigeru Ban unveil an updated prototype for temporary housing in Turkey

Temporary and Permanent As a Choice, Pictured As Words Temporary

HeadlineSphere