Does Iran Support ISIS? Unraveling A Complex Geopolitical Question

Miss Breanna Baumbach DDS 23 Jun 2025

The question of whether Iran supports ISIS is one that frequently arises in discussions about Middle Eastern geopolitics, often fueled by complex regional rivalries and a lack of clear information. At first glance, the idea might seem plausible to some, given the intricate web of alliances and antagonisms in the region. However, a deeper examination of historical facts, ideological differences, and strategic interests reveals a very different picture, one where Iran has consistently positioned itself as a formidable adversary to the Islamic State.

This article aims to dissect the multifaceted relationship between Iran and ISIS, exploring the evidence, dispelling common misconceptions, and providing a nuanced understanding of Iran's role in the fight against the extremist group. By drawing upon documented events and expert analysis, we will uncover why the narrative of Iranian support for ISIS not only lacks credible evidence but directly contradicts Iran's stated objectives and actions on the ground.

Iran's Immediate Response to the ISIS Threat

When the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), then known as ISIL, launched its devastating offensive across northern Iraq in early June 2014, seizing Mosul and threatening Baghdad, the international community was caught off guard. While many nations deliberated their response, Iran acted swiftly and decisively. It is a critical, often overlooked fact that **Iran was the first country to pledge assistance to Iraq to fight ISIL, deploying troops in early June 2014 following the North Iraq offensive.** This rapid deployment underscores Iran's immediate recognition of ISIS as a direct and existential threat, not just to Iraq but to regional stability and, by extension, to Iran's own security interests.

The urgency of Iran's response was not merely symbolic. President of Iraq Fuad Masum himself has publicly praised Iran as the first country to provide weapons to Iraq to fight against the ISIL takfiri terrorists. This direct military and logistical support came at a crucial time when Iraqi forces were reeling from ISIS's rapid advances. Iran's actions were pragmatic and immediate, reflecting a clear strategic imperative to halt the spread of an extremist group that threatened its borders and its regional influence. The notion that Iran would support a group it was actively fighting and supplying weapons against is fundamentally illogical.

The Ideological Chasm: Shia Iran vs. Sunni ISIS

Beyond the strategic imperative, the ideological divide between Iran and ISIS is profound and irreconcilable. Iran is the world's largest Shia Muslim power, founded on the principles of the Islamic Revolution and guided by a clerical leadership. ISIS, on the other hand, is a radical Sunni Salafi jihadist organization that views Shia Muslims as apostates and infidels, worthy of death. This fundamental theological antagonism makes any alliance or direct support between the two entities virtually impossible.

The very doctrines that ISIS endorses were born in Saudi madrasas, a stark contrast to the theological schools of Qom and Mashhad in Iran. ISIS's worldview is predicated on the violent eradication of Shia Islam and the establishment of a global caliphate based on its extremist interpretation of Sunni Islam. For Iran, ISIS represents not just a security threat but an existential ideological enemy that seeks to undermine the very foundations of its religious and political identity. The rise of a new Sunni extremist group in the Middle East has indeed become a significant security threat in an already volatile region, and Iran views groups like ISIS as direct threats to its regional standing and the safety of Shia populations.

On-the-Ground Support: Iraq and the Kurds

Iran's commitment to fighting ISIS extended beyond initial pledges, manifesting in tangible support on multiple fronts within Iraq.

Early Assistance to Baghdad

As previously noted, Iran's military advisors and weapons shipments were critical in bolstering the Iraqi armed forces and Popular Mobilization Units (PMUs) in their early struggles against ISIS. This assistance was not limited to strategic advice; it involved direct engagement and material support that helped turn the tide in several key battles. Iran's intervention was instrumental in preventing Baghdad from falling and in enabling Iraqi forces to begin reclaiming lost territory.

Supporting Iraqi Kurdistan

The fight against ISIS also saw Iran extending its support to the Iraqi Kurds. While often overshadowed by later events, the early assistance Iran supplied to the Iraqi Kurds against ISIS in 2014 is a distant memory, overshadowed by Iran’s contribution to the more recent Iraqi conquest of Makhmour. This highlights Iran's pragmatic approach: supporting any force willing and able to fight ISIS, regardless of traditional political alignments, when the threat was most acute. This cooperation with Kurdish forces, who are often at odds with central Iraqi authorities, further demonstrates Iran's singular focus on defeating ISIS rather than adhering strictly to pre-existing political rivalries during the height of the crisis.

Iran's Role in Syria: A Different Battlefield

While Iran's anti-ISIS efforts in Iraq are relatively straightforward, its involvement in Syria adds layers of complexity that can sometimes lead to misinterpretations regarding its stance on ISIS. Iran's primary objective in Syria has been to support the Bashar al-Assad regime, a long-standing ally.

Bolstering the Syrian Regime

Iran is gathering support for the Syrian regime, a strategic imperative that predates the rise of ISIS. Iran bolstered a flailing Syrian economy in 1982 by providing free oil, establishing a deep, decades-long relationship. While religious ties between the Alawis (Assad's sect) and Twelvers (Iran's dominant Shia sect) were as strained as ever, the alliance was geopolitical and strategic, forming a crucial part of Iran's "Axis of Resistance" against Israel and Western influence. When ISIS emerged as a powerful force in Syria, it became another enemy for the Assad regime, and by extension, for Iran.

Iran's support for Assad, therefore, is not an endorsement of ISIS; rather, it is a commitment to a strategic ally who also happens to be fighting ISIS, among other rebel groups. The Syrian conflict is a multi-sided war, and while the US and its allies have focused primarily on ISIS, Iran and the Syrian regime have been fighting a broader array of opposition groups, including ISIS, Al-Qaeda affiliates, and various Free Syrian Army factions.

Clashing Interests with the US in Syria

The complexity in Syria often stems from the fact that various anti-ISIS actors have conflicting agendas. Iran wants the US to leave eastern Syria, where the US is fighting ISIS alongside the Syrian Democratic Forces, a mostly Kurdish force. This creates a perception of indirect opposition, not because Iran supports ISIS, but because it opposes the US military presence and its support for groups that Iran views with suspicion or as threats to its Syrian ally. Both Iran and the US are fighting ISIS, but they do so with different partners and ultimately different visions for Syria's future. This divergence in strategic objectives can obscure the shared goal of defeating ISIS.

Distinguishing Iran's Allies from ISIS

A common source of confusion in understanding **does Iran support ISIS** stems from Iran's relationships with other non-state actors in the region. Iran does not designate the Taliban as a terrorist organization, and the IRGC actively opposed any U.S. presence in Afghanistan. American and British officials have accused Iran in the past of giving weapons and support to the Taliban insurgency. This fact, while true, must be understood in context. Iran's support for groups like the Taliban (historically, against a US presence) or various Shia militias in Iraq and Lebanon (Hezbollah) is driven by its own regional security doctrine and geopolitical interests, which are distinct from those of ISIS.

There is no evidence of direct Iranian government support for Salafi groups, of which ISIS is a prime example. Iran's strategic calculus involves supporting groups that align with its "Axis of Resistance" or that can serve as a counterweight to its adversaries. ISIS, being a radical Sunni Salafi organization that targets Shia populations and seeks to overthrow existing regional states, fundamentally opposes Iran's interests. Therefore, conflating Iran's support for some non-state actors with support for ISIS is a critical analytical error. Iran's enemies are not necessarily its allies' enemies, and its friends are not necessarily its enemies' friends. It's a complex chessboard, not a simple dichotomy.

The Complex Web of Proxy Groups

Iran's foreign policy often relies on a network of proxy groups – groups that are connected to Iran but not directly controlled. This strategy is central to understanding Iran's regional influence and its plausible deniability regarding certain actions. While this system allows Iran to project power and maintain influence without direct military intervention in every instance, it also introduces complexities.

Plausible Deniability and Shared Interests

This allows Iran to have plausible deniability when these groups use violence while maintaining the power to have them operate in Iran’s interests. In the context of ISIS, many of these Iran-backed groups, particularly Shia militias in Iraq, have been at the forefront of the fight against ISIS. Their interests in eliminating ISIS align perfectly with Iran's. These groups, often motivated by religious duty and national defense, have proven to be effective fighting forces against the extremist organization.

The Downside of Uncontrolled Proxies

The downside for Iran, however, is these groups often have their own interests that Iran does not control or direct. While their primary objective against ISIS has largely aligned with Iran's, their actions in other contexts, or their post-ISIS roles, can sometimes diverge from Tehran's precise directives. However, this inherent semi-autonomy of proxy groups does not translate into support for ISIS. On the contrary, these groups have been crucial instruments in Iran's anti-ISIS strategy, albeit with their own motivations and operational methods.

Accusations Against Other Regional Actors

It is also important to note that while the question **does Iran support ISIS** is often raised, other regional states have faced far more substantiated accusations of indirect or even direct support for extremist groups. Islamic State outperformed all other militant rebel groups in Syria and continues to claim ground. Many Gulf states have been accused of funding Islamic State (IS) extremists in Iraq and Syria, often through proxies or by turning a blind eye to private donors. These accusations, stemming from various intelligence reports and analyses, highlight that if there was any external state support for ISIS, it came from sources ideologically aligned with Sunni extremism, not from Shia Iran.

This contextualization is crucial. While Iran's regional actions are often scrutinized, its consistent opposition to ISIS stands in stark contrast to the historical allegations against certain other actors in the region who, at various points, may have seen extremist groups as useful tools against their own adversaries, particularly the Syrian regime. Iran, conversely, saw ISIS as a universal threat that needed to be eradicated.

Conclusion: Does Iran Support ISIS? A Resounding No

Based on the overwhelming evidence, the answer to the question, **does Iran support ISIS**, is a resounding no. From the moment ISIS emerged as a formidable threat, Iran was among the first, if not *the* first, to provide direct military assistance to Iraq to combat the group. President Fuad Masum's praise for Iran's swift provision of weapons underscores this critical role. Ideologically, the Shia-majority Iran and the radical Sunni ISIS are diametrically opposed, viewing each other as existential enemies. As AQI metastasized across Iraq and eventually became ISIS, Iran sought to position itself at the vanguard of the global effort against the terrorist group, claiming that it was actively fighting against it, a claim supported by its actions.

While Iran's complex network of proxy groups and its support for the Syrian regime may lead to misunderstandings, these actions are rooted in Iran's own strategic interests and its broader regional agenda, which consistently identifies ISIS as an enemy. There is no credible evidence of direct Iranian government support for Salafi groups like ISIS. Instead, the historical record points to Iran being a consistent and often effective adversary of ISIS on multiple fronts.

Understanding this complex geopolitical reality is vital for informed discourse on the Middle East. It's not a simple case of black and white, but the evidence clearly demonstrates that Iran and ISIS are adversaries, not allies. For further insights into regional dynamics or to explore other geopolitical topics, feel free to delve into our other articles. What are your thoughts on Iran's role in the Middle East? Share your perspectives in the comments below!

One Dose In, And Your Life Will Never Be The Same!

What Does Crack Look Like? | How Crack Looks, Smells, & Feels

do and does worksheets with answers for grade 1, 2, 3 | Made By Teachers

HeadlineSphere